|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|


|
Name:
Robert Myers
Profession: Pilot, ERA
Aviation
Pilot since: 1993
Aircraft: Twin Otter (DHC-6)
and DHC-8
Home base: Anchorage (PANC)
Use: Scheduled Airline
Era Aviation operates nine Twin
Otters and four Dash 8s offering
scheduled and charter airline
service from hubs located in
Anchorage and Bethel, Alaska. In the
last year, they have installed three
screen Chelton Flight Systems EFISs
in all nine Twin Otters. Robert
Myers is the supervisor of flight
for the Twin Otters and was somewhat
familiar with the Chelton EFIS
through the Capstone Program.
"I also saw the Chelton EFIS at
the Alaska Airmen's Association
Expo. We participated in Capstone's
Phase I, and applied for Phase II
when we found out the Chelton EFIS
was certified Class A
TAWS."
"We average 12 flights a day
out of Bethel, with 2 hour round
trips. Our other service links
Anchorage Kenai and Homer, with
about 20 flights a day, although it
varies. We have a total of about 76
pilots; and of that - 45 are Twin
Otter pilots. They are split about
2/3 in Anchorage and 1/3 in Bethel.
The FAA TAWS mandate in March 2005
would affect all the Twin Otters,
which can be configured with up to
19 seats. Some of these aircraft are
30 years old, with every kind of
upgrade and patch it takes to meet
the changing regulations over the
years. If we could settle on an
integrated system to install in all
the aircraft, it would simplify
scheduling, training, flying and
maintenance. We had to have a TAWS
solution to stay in the air, and
decided to use this as an
opportunity start from the ground up
and standardize the Twin Otter
fleet."
Era was accepted into Phase II of
the Capstone program, and because
the Twin Otters have two pilot
crews, they upgraded each of the
standard two-screen systems with a
third screen. "This way we have
two Primary Flight Displays and one
screen in center as a Multifunction
Display," Robert said. Each
pilot has a PFD in front of them.
It's the most safe and efficient
setup to have both pilots on the
same instrument display. We set the
MFD in the center for both pilots to
reference. The TAWS alerts can be
easily referenced by either pilot on
the middle screen if
necessary.
"We installed the EFIS
system in the Era Aviation Facility,
and of course there was a learning
curve. We were gutting the aircraft
and starting over with a green
cockpit. The first one took 6-7
weeks, but by the end we were down
to 3 ˝ weeks. We estimate each
plane lost about 70 pounds. Our
avionics and maintenance staff
really did a great job. We started
on the planes based in Anchorage,
and the first one flew in revenue
service at the end of Dec 2004. By
March 2005, we had two more done in
Anchorage. We started on the planes
based in Bethel in April and by the
end of August all of them were
done.
The training started in December
2004. Training on any EFIS is going
to be difficult, because most flight
schools still don't train on EFIS;
everyone comes out flying on round
dials. With the screens, there's a
little bit of a shock factor. It's a
big leap. But once you take to it,
it becomes more and more natural. I
did the flight training for about 30
pilots in Anchorage. At first there
was resistance to the change, like
anything new. But I've found the
EFIS to be user-friendly and by the
end of flight training a lot of the
pilots agreed. We all appreciate the
situational awareness we get from
the forward-looking display and the
moving map. We also like the ability
to overlay any approach (ILS, RNAV,
VOR, NDB) on the moving map."
" We are looking forward to
the next software update to provide
a data link for WSI weather and ADSB
traffic. Gamma 3 GPS WAAS for
precision GPS approaches will be
very useful. Those features will add
to a great system that is promoting
safety and efficiency."
For more information about Era
Aviation, please see www.eraaviation.com
Back to top
|
|
|
|

|
Name: Bucky
Oliver
Profession: Owner, JetCraft
Instructor since: 1961
Aircraft: Learjet,
Citations, Citation I/SP
Home base: Raleigh, NC
Use: Business and Personal
Travel
Bucky Oliver owns JetCraft, a
company with offices in Raleigh,
Minneapolis, San Antonio and
Redding, California. They buy,
upgrade and sell aircraft; they act
as aircraft brokers for buyers and
sellers; they are a completion and
sales channel for the Challenger
604.
Bucky has been evaluating,
upgrading and selling planes for 45
years. “I saw some of the media
advertising on the Chelton system,
but when a client of mine, an
owner/pilot installed a Chelton
system in his Citation, I was more
interested. He recommended I talk to
Jim Wright at Landmark Aviation.
Since buying and selling airplanes
is my business, I put them through
the inquisition. I came to the
conclusion that the Chelton EFIS was
what I wanted for my Citation.
I consider this a long term
investment because I fly this
airplane four days a week. I have
all the functionality I was looking
for. My wife accompanies me on many
trips, and we are both glad I put in
the dual system in a ‘single pilot’
Citation. She has her own set of
instruments.
I wanted RVSM capability, and
looked at the difference in the
price to install dual air data
computers with and without the
Chelton system. It was not that much
more to upgrade it all. For traffic,
I put in the L3 40-mile TCAS system,
I put in charts, XM uplink weather.
These will not return hard value to
cost, but it’s worth it.
Landmark Aviation started the
plane in the fall of last year. It
took just over a month to finish the
installation. The downtime was quite
reasonable. Chelton used our
Citation as the project plane to get
FAA approval on the four-screen dual
sensor system architecture. We were
in the experimental category for
about six months, which didn’t
matter because of the way we fly. We
fly private business trips all over
the country, without other
passengers.
I was very comfortable with the
training materials. I had some
advantage, being in experimental
category, we had to go on flights to
prove the system to put it back in
certified category. So there was
time to read the manual, fly the
plane and put it all in practice. I
have not had many questions, that I
couldn’t find answers to in the
manual. The Chelton pilots are very
helpful too. I read the manual in
flight, in downtimes enroute. I
would also like to see an
internet-based training.
The Chelton EFIS is
extraordinarily user friendly. It is
not burdensome at all to trap, load
and fly. I like the mapping of the
traffic displayed on the screens,
forward looking, as well as top down
which is dramatically different than
the competition.
I enjoy the topographical
portion. I like the zoom function on
approach. Once you get older, you
need to have a bigger view of
things. Approaches are simplified.
The only thing Chelton ought to do
is paint the centerline on the
runway. You could actually land it
on the centerline if it was
depicted. It is that accurate.
“We don’t have reason to put
in a lot of flight plans. We are a
nimble company with very little
repetition in the routes. I usually
just put the destination in, and
work backwards. I fly direct 90% of
the time. On the East coast I use
the Victor airways, and the airspace
display.
The HITS is so tight — 400 feet
wide — we find we don’t really
need it enroute. But on the
approach, whether VFR or IFR it is
much more useful. It is very easy to
program. It doesn’t take much to
understand this system, and be able
to set up an approach. For example,
my wife is planning to take the
pinch hitter course, and I am
looking forward to her learning to
set up an approach with this system.
It would give me a lot of comfort to
know she knows how to use it, and
use the information displayed during
approach.
I have shown a lot of
professionals this system. Everyone
comes away with their chins on their
chests. They recognize I am getting
more performance and features out of
this system than anything else on
the market. Compared to the
Honeywell and Collins systems,
frankly, this outdisplays
information. It is more
user-friendly, more integrated, with
the GPS, the fuel, the navigation,
the TAWS, the call outs. It provides
a more understandable, integrated
system than the Proline 21; the
biggest difference is, the Chelton
EFIS is much more flexible.”
For more information contact
Landmark Aviation - Roanoke
22 Waypoint Dr Roanoke, VA 24012
800-768-4401
www.landmarkaviation.com
Back to top
|
|
|
|


|
Name:
Stuart
Boblett
Profession: Chief Pilot
Instructor since: 1974
Aircraft: Citation 501,
Eagle 400
Home base: Roanoke, VA
Use: Corporate
Stuart Boblett is a corporate pilot,
and has flown Citations on and off
for the past 20 years. After owning
a Citation 501 for 10 years, his
company started exploring the
possibly of converting the existing
analog panel to an EFIS system. He
explained: “The cost of the other
systems available was pretty much
cost prohibitive for an older
aircraft like the Citation. When we
learned about the Chelton System
from magazine articles it seemed
like a good fit for our situation.”
“Not only was it a
cost-effective way to convert our
analog instruments to a modern EFIS
type of system, the added features
were impressive, such as the TAWS
capability, the ability to interface
with our existing analog autopilot
and the increase in situational
awareness with the synthetic vision
on the PFD.
While researching the system, we
received quotes from several
dealers. We chose Piedmont-Hawthorne
Aviation in Roanoke, VA from their
competitive quote and from the huge
effort they put forth in getting us
all the information we needed to
make a decision. They showed us
before the sale that they really
wanted our business. They have done
work for us before with excellent
results. The Chelton install, along
with several other upgrades
performed at the same time went
smoothly and professionally. All of
their staff worked tirelessly to
make the install a success. Problems
after the install were minimal which
is remarkable considering the scope
of what was accomplished.”
The plane was delivered in July
2005, and they’ve put about 75
hours on it. Stuart said, “My
favorite features may be the flight
planning capabilities. It is very
easy to enter and modify flight
plans. This system requires much
less ‘head down’ time when
entering information in flight than
other FMS’s. It has many
capabilities and is also designed
for easy upgrade in the future as
technology improves.”
“When other pilots ask about
the system, we highly recommend the
Chelton. It increases situational
awareness and makes many procedures
easier and safer, cutting down on
pilot workload during critical
phases of flight. I have flown other
EFIS systems using other FMS units
and this is by far the most user
friendly system I have experienced.”
Stuart’s advice to others: “If
you are looking for an upgrade for
your aircraft, it will be well worth
your while to consider the Chelton
System. It gives much more for the
dollars spent on an EFIS system than
anything else on the market at this
time. Like any new system, it takes
several hours to get really
comfortable with the system and its
capabilities, but the effort is well
worth it.”
Back to top
|
|
|
|


|
Name:
Greg
K. Webster
Profession: Pilot
Pilot since: 1972
Aircraft: MS 760 Paris
Jet,
Cessna 310, Metroliner
Home base: Carlsbad, CA (CRQ)
Use: Business/Pleasure
When Your Aircraft Source decided to
launch a refurbishment program using
the MS-760 Paris Jet, they quickly
decided that the appropriate upgrade
for the panel would be a Chelton
EFIS.
Paris Jet production is located
at Calhoun Airport near Atlanta,
Georgia and to date, they have
remanufactured 20 copies of the
rugged, aerobatic, four-place light
twin. Their first plane was
introduced at the Sun ‘n Fun
Fly-In last year. Greg Webster,
explains why they chose the Chelton
EFIS: “ As a Chief Instructor for
a Part 141 school, I have frequently
had the opportunity to fly the
G-1000 in the Cessna, and the
Avidyne in the Cirrus. I just logged
my first 30 hours behind the Chelton
FlightLogic EFIS installed in an
MS-760 Paris Jet, and no amount of
reading the manual or viewing their
CD could have prepared me for how
incredible the system is.
WAAS GPS together with the HITS
(highway in the sky) allowed me to
effortlessly program a VFR or IFR
approach from my current position to
any airport or user defined
waypoint, with tremendous accuracy
and confidence in low visibility
night approaches to unfamiliar
airports. I even practiced 0/0
landings under the hood with a
safety pilot and although I would
never bust minimums in actual
conditions, it sure gave me some
confidence that in an emergency
situation I could get the airplane
and passengers down safely using the
HITS in approach mode and utilizing
the “Zoom” feature to magnify
the airport and landing environment.
I successfully completed over 10
such approaches and landings during
a trip from Atlanta to Reno and
return.
The TAWS and synthetic ground
mapping feature are vastly superior
to anything offered by Avidyne or
Garmin and provide realistic
simulated terrain and obstacle views
on takeoff and landing. When making
turns, the TAWS looks ahead to where
you will be in one minute and
actually gives you terrain warnings
for your future path (even behind
the aircraft in a 180 degree turn)
Many, many additional features such
as low fuel warnings that only come
on in cruise and descent to avoid
giving you that incessant false
warning we all come to ignore in
take off situations. Very smart
engineering all around.
Don’t get me wrong; I love the
Garmin and Avidyne. Therefore, I
have to ask myself if the extra
money Chelton costs is worth all of
the bells and whistles. After 30
hours behind the knobs of Chelton, I
guess I have concluded that the
first time it saves my life it’s
worth whatever I had to pay.
Frankly, it is not that much more
than other alternatives and is more
readily available for after-market
installations. Garmin wouldn’t
even talk to me about installing a
G-1000 in my Paris Jet, and although
Avidyne was very nice, they wanted
to pass on their certification costs
in my Type. I could not have been
more enthusiastically welcomed or
professionally treated than I was by
the Chelton team. I think the
marketplace will certainly respond
and reward this technology and
outstanding customer service!
Back to top
|
|
|
|


|
Name: Pat
Cronin
Profession: CEO Cronin Company
Pilot since: 1963
Aircraft: P210 - Sliver
Eagle
Home base: Hillsboro (HIO)
Use: 70% Business/30%
Pleasure
When Pat Cronin has had a 1980 P210
as the Cronin Company plane since
1985, flying it from the Portland
area to their branch offices in
Washington and Oregon. The plane was
great for shorter distances, but on
the longer trips, the refueling
stops added time and trouble. Last
year Pat started looking at
upgrading the plane. He found that
O&N Aircraft Modifications in
Factoryville, PA offered a Rolls
Royce Gas Turbine 250-B17F/2 engine
for the Pressurized 210 airframe
(the Silver Eagle conversion) for
more range and speed. While the
plane is down, interior and paint
can be completely redone and the
avionics upgraded. O & N has
currently done over 10 Chelton EFIS
installs and offers it as an option
during the retrofit.
Pat said, “I had seen the
Chelton EFIS in magazines and was
generally aware of the capabilities,
but the first time we really looked
at it was at the AOPA Expo in Long
Beach last year. We had the Sandell,
the MX-20 and the CNX-80. I was
interested in keeping the newer
equipment, but updating the old
gauges. We saw a demo of the
displays and then saw a P210 O &
N conversion with the Chelton EFIS
installed. After seeing the
installation we knew they had the
experience for the job.”
“The plane was delivered in
June. Overall, the whole conversion
went very well, it ran long, but at
least they had the airplane for the
winter months. We went over to
Pennsylvania to deliver it and then
back to pick it up. It was like a
whole new plane, but for less than
half the price of a new turboprop.
It had all new interior, upholstery,
paint, the works. We got rid of the
Sandell, but kept the MX 20 and the
CNX 80 which compliment the Chelton
EFIS. We had chartview and WSI
weather on the MX20 and added the
Ryan TCAD and WX500 Strikefinder. We
also added the Chelton APC-3
auto-pilot.
My favorite feature is probably
the Highway in the Sky. I also like
the scan. All the info is in one
place. It’s an easier instrument
platform to fly now. Before we
picked up the plane, I studied the
video and the book. When we got to O
& N, we had about 30 hours of
time with an instructor at the
factory. Then we flew it back across
the country. Thunder storms were a
problem, so we took the southern
route with stops in St Louis, MO,
Pueblo, CO, Cedar City, UT then on
to Hillsboro, OR. The trip took 1
day and about 13 hours of flying.
I visit the branch locations
quite often, so I’ve programmed in
a series of flight plans we can use
over and over. Once you get used to
it, the flight planning features are
simple to use. The new range is over
1,000 miles. We fly non stop
Portland to Denver or Portland to
Phoenix now. The plane is about 30%
faster, and much more capable, and I’m
glad the avionics are too. The EFIS
makes it easier and safer to fly.
When I fly with other pilots who may
not have seen the system first hand,
they are always very impressed with
the system. It really is state of
the art.”
My advice to other pilots
considering the Chelton EFIS: while
researching, I found that the
Chelton EFIS is the only real choice
for upgrading the Silver Eagle from
the standard instruments. But even
if there were more choices approved,
I’d pick the Chelton hands down.
If you want to go to the state of
art, this may be the only approved
one, but that’s for good reason.
The highway in the sky, the terrain,
everything it offers is superior to
anything else we looked at.”
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|